Post #7: Harm Reduction to Promote Safe Practices Among the Homeless Population

hrSince it has become evident that the homeless population experiences an increased prevalence of communicable diseases in comparison to the general population, it is necessary to identify various approaches we can take to reduce their susceptibility. One such approach is harm reduction, which is built on the principle of respecting individuals’ decision to utilize substances (Collins et al., 2015). It is an approach used to minimize or reduce the potential negative consequences that may be caused due to drug use/abuse (Collins et al., 2015). Several individuals experiencing homelessness have a history of mental illness or are suffering from substance addictions which increases their likelihood to utilize needles (Bonar & Rosenberg, 2010).

As mentioned earlier, HIV/AIDs can be transmitted through bodily fluids, including reusing needles or needlestick injuries. By providing users with kits containing sterile needles, they will be able to reduce their needle re-usage or refrain from sharing needles with others (Collins et al., 2015). This evidently reduces the risk of transmitting and contracting HIV/AIDs. Also, since HIV is commonly transmitted through unsafe sexual intercourse, it is important to provide condoms and as well as education on safe sex in order to prevent these risky behaviors from occurring (Bonar & Rosenberg, 2010). This encourages and supports individuals experiencing homelessness to gain a sense of control over their health and to reduce the risks they encounter on the streets (Stamler & Yui, 2012).

Alcohol addictions create difficulties in sustaining employment, finances and creates barriers in one’s social relationships (McNeil et al., 2012). Several individuals experiencing homelessness suffer from alcohol addictions, which can also be targeted by strategies of harm reduction. There are specific low-barrier shelter programs which allow individuals to drink in moderation under supervision (McNeil et al., 2012). It helps to prevent individuals from experiencing withdrawal symptoms that they would with sudden drinking cessation (McNeil et al., 2012).

As a student nurse, I understand that harm reduction can be a controversial topic. However, from a nursing standpoint, I would support this practice using the ethical principle of beneficence. This principle supports the notion of promoting good to the public, which is a nurse’s duty (Bonar & Rosenberg, 2010). I believe that harm reduction is a successful and beneficial approach to reducing the transmission of communicable diseases among the homeless population.

If you are interested in learning more about low barrier shelter programs in Canada, check out the link provided below. It will provide a great overview of the shelter!

Link #1:

Low Barrier VS High Barrier Shelters – Why Is Abbotsford Different?

To learn about the Annex Harm Reduction Program that is currently being implemented in Toronto, check out the provided link. It provides a summary of a day in the program.

Link #2:

http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=ac2baf2c85006410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD

References

A Day in the Life: The Seaton House Annex Program – Housing & Homelessness Services (n.d.)  Housing & Homelessness Services – City of Toronto. Retrieved from         http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=ac2baf2c85006410VgnVCM    0000071d60f89RCRD

Bonar, E. E., & Rosenberg, H. (2010). Substance abuse professionals’ attitudes regarding harm      reduction versus traditional interventions for injecting drug users. Addiction Research &    Theory, 18(6), 692-707. doi:10.3109/16066359.2010.483310

Collins, S. E., Duncan, M. H., Smart, B. F., Saxon, A. J., Malone, D. K., Jackson, T. R., & Ries,  R. K. (2015). Extended-release naltrexone and harm reduction counseling for chronically      homeless people with alcohol dependence.Substance Abuse, 36(1), 21-33.            doi:10.1080/08897077.2014.904838

Collins, S. E., Grazioli, V. S., Torres, N. I., Taylor, E. M., Jones, C. B., Hoffman, G. E.. . Dean,    P. E. (2015). Qualitatively and quantitatively evaluating harm-reduction goal setting            among chronically homeless individuals with alcohol dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 45, 184-190. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.001

McNeil, R., Guirguis-Younger, M., Dilley, L. B., Aubry, T. D., Turnbull, J., & Hwang, S. W.       (2012). Harm reduction services as a point-of-entry to and source of end-of-life care and      support for homeless and marginally housed persons who use alcohol and/or illicit drugs:   A qualitative analysis. BMC Public Health, 12, 312. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471    2458-12-312

The Editor (2014, June 2). Low barrier vs high barrier shelters – why is Abbotsford different?        Abbotsford Today. Retrieved from http://www.abbotsfordtoday.ca/low-barrier-vs-high   barrier-shelters-why-is-abbotsford-different/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s